azjilo.blogg.se

Nikon adobe dng converter
Nikon adobe dng converter













Why on earth are you doing that? It certainly doesn’t have any advantage to put them on the wrong side and to use the wrong graphics, and again it leaves the impression that Adobe simply doesn’t care about Mac-like interfaces.

nikon adobe dng converter

In the course of many hundred prerelease forum messages discussing the new interface changes in CS4, no one ever mentioned the tab close boxes being problematic (and believe me, the feedback overall was extremely thorough). Does the left/right placement of the close boxes have one? No. Things like the existence of an app frame have an obvious functional impact. What functional difference does this make? John Gruber (whose mention of the close box placement is likely what inspired you to visit and write this) has previously commented that “‘onsistency’ is essential only when it actually affects usability, and that consistency for its own sake is not important.” So must Transmit, because although it puts the close boxes on the left, it uses an Aqua highlight color (which Safari doesn’t). Thus Firefox (which puts the close boxes on the right) must be wrong. [Of course, that presumes that if something comes from Apple, it must be correct, and everything else is wrong.

#NIKON ADOBE DNG CONVERTER MAC#

wrong) side of the tab and look like Windows close buttons, not like the close buttons Mac users expect (i.e. Now I just saw that the “Close Tab” buttons in Photoshop CS4 are on the right (i.e. The latter was the reason you gave for the new MDI interface in Photoshop CS4. I apologize in advance for posting my Photoshop rant here, but I really want you to see it.Īgain and again, you write that Adobe does listen to Mac customers, does try to create Mac-like applications and will only introduce non-Mac-like features if they really offer an advantage over the Mac-like way.













Nikon adobe dng converter